
Claude and ChatGPT are chatbots developed by Anthropic and OpenAI, respectively. They facilitate user interaction with the LLMs, like Sonnet, Opus, or GPT, behind the scenes.
Chatbots have different 'personalities', different interfaces, different resources, and different strengths and weaknesses. If you're deciding which one to use, here's what you need to know:
Everyone wants to know which AI is better. This article will help you figure out which one works for what you're trying to do, whether that's writing, research, or having better conversations.
» Learn more about the LLMs behind ChatGPT and Claude.
| Feature | Claude | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Free Tier | Limited daily messages | Limited GPT3.5 access |
| Paid Plan | Claude Pro ($20/month), Max ($100200/month) | ChatGPT Plus ($20/month), Pro ($200/month) |
| What it's good at | Deep conversations, creative writing, web search with citations | Image generation, Custom GPTs, quick answers, extensive features |
| What it's not good at | No image generation, fewer integrated tools | Gets confused in long conversations, less creative |
| Web Browsing | Yes (since March 2025) | Yes |
| File Handling | Extensive (PDFs, DOCX, images, CSV, code 30MB/file, 20 files) | Good (PDFs, images, spreadsheets) |
Claude delivers superior conversational quality. It understands subtle context, adapts its style to match yours, and reasons through problems instead of just pattern-matching. As a result, Claude feels more like talking to a person rather than a very smart computer.
The reasoning difference is significant. Ask Claude to solve a complex problem, and it'll work through it step by step, ask clarifying questions, and build on your responses. ChatGPT tends to provide information dumps and confidently answer questions that might be subtly incorrect.
Choose Claude if you want conversations that feel like conversations.
Claude remembers everything within individual conversations, supporting up to 200,000+ tokens for Pro users. You can start discussing a business plan, dive into market research, and then circle back to your original idea: Claude connects all those details naturally within the same chat.
ChatGPT supports up to 128,000 tokens and begins to lose context in very long conversations. You'll find yourself saying "like I mentioned earlier" more often.
So, Claude wins for extended conversations within single sessions.
ChatGPT responds faster, typically within 2-3 seconds, versus Claude's 5-10 seconds. This makes a difference in rapid-fire conversations and brainstorming, where maintaining flow is crucial.
Claude's slower responses are usually more thoughtful, but the delay can break conversational momentum.
For quick back-and-forth conversations, ChatGPT is your winner.
ChatGPT offers more integrated features: web browsing, extensive file uploads, image generation with DALL-E, and Custom GPTs. You can research recent news, analyze documents, create visuals, and use specialized tools all in one place.
Claude now offers web search with citations, extensive file handling (including PDFs, DOCX, images, CSV, and code files, up to 30MB each, with a limit of 20 files at once), Artifacts for collaborative editing, and Research mode for in-depth analysis. However, it lacks image generation.
ChatGPT’s overall feature breadth, particularly in visual content creation, puts it on top.
Creative Writing & Content Generation
No doubt, Claude produces significantly better creative content. It understands voice, tone, and style intuitively, takes creative risks, and maintains consistency across long projects. Its dialogue sounds like real people talking.
ChatGPT generates competent but formulaic content. You can tell a computer wrote it because it hits expected beats without creative risks.
Claude excels in any creative work that requires personality and a human touch.
Both can now surf the net, but ChatGPT has a longer-established web browsing experience with good integration across its features. Claude's web search was added in March 2025 and provides direct citations and fact-checking capabilities, but it’s a newer feature.
ChatGPT's broader tool ecosystem gives it a slight edge for complex research workflows, while Claude excels at synthesizing and analyzing the information it finds.
ChatGPT wins slightly for comprehensive research workflows.
Claude Pro costs $20 per month, with Claude Max at $100-$ 200 per month for power users. ChatGPT Plus costs $20 per month, with ChatGPT Pro at $200 per month for enterprise use.
At the $20 level, ChatGPT Plus offers additional features, including web browsing, image generation, Custom GPTs, and file handling. Claude Pro provides unlimited access to enhanced conversations, web search, and comprehensive file processing.
On value, we give this to ChatGPT.
ChatGPT's interface feels more polished with an organized conversation history, effective search, and clear access to all features. The mobile apps include most desktop functionality.
Claude maintains simplicity with a clean interface focused on conversations, plus Artifacts for collaborative editing. Mobile apps are now available with full functionality.
This is a close call; it really comes down to personal preference.
Claude handles sensitive topics more thoughtfully using Constitutional AI. It can discuss complex ethical issues while maintaining boundaries, and understands context better, so it'll help you write thriller fiction without assuming harmful intent.
ChatGPT employs rigorous safety filters that sometimes reject legitimate requests. It’s more predictable, but can be frustratingly restrictive.
If you're looking into the LLMs behind Claude and ChatGPT for a voice agent build, you'll need to consider further compliance parameters.
Claude wins for nuanced handling of sensitive topics.
Here are a few common tasks where one option should be considered over the other:
Creative Projects: Claude excels at writing stories, poems, and innovative content that feels authentically human.
Research: Both can now search the web, but ChatGPT's integrated tools give it an edge for complex research workflows.
Learning: Claude explains complex concepts better and maintains context throughout learning sessions.
Productivity: ChatGPT provides additional tools for document creation, image generation, and task automation.
Choose Claude if you:
Choose ChatGPT if you:
Bottom line: Claude excels at conversation and creativity. ChatGPT excels at utility and features. Choose based on what you'll use it for the most.
Both OpenAI's GPT models and Anthropic's Claude models are available for developers building custom applications. Both integrate seamlessly with platforms like Vapi, allowing you to leverage the same conversational abilities in voice agents or customer service systems.
Whether you prefer Claude's nuanced reasoning or ChatGPT's versatility, you can access these capabilities for your projects.
» Start building with Anthropic and OpenAI.
Which is better, Claude or ChatGPT? It depends on your use case. Claude excels at creative work and deep conversations. ChatGPT is better for research and productivity tasks.
Is Claude better than ChatGPT for writing? Yes, Claude produces more natural and creative writing. The difference is substantial.
How much does Claude cost vs ChatGPT? Both options start at $20 per month. ChatGPT includes more features, while Claude focuses on conversation quality.
Can Claude browse the web like ChatGPT? Yes, as of March 2025, Claude can search the web and provide citations for fact-checking.
\